I am now going to yell at myself: TAMMY, how could send a post about
not having the contents match the subject line and forget to change
the subject line?

So here is my correction and huge apologies to the sarcasm police
for my egregious error.

Tammy
ADG # 1/2 (I just demoted myself)


--- In letterbox-usa@yahoogroups.com, "Flame Thrower"
wrote:
> And because I am contrary by nature:
>
> I would appreciate it if posters could intentionally change the
> subject line to something completed unrelated to the contents of
the
> post. That way I can think I'll be reading about some pleasurable
> Disney worthy jaunt your family made into the jungle and instead I
> will find myself gleefully reading yet another off-topic rant full
> of misplaced anger and he-said, she-saids.
>
> That would really make my day, especially since I can't find my
> rubber chicken nor my Martian popping thing.
>
> Tammy
> ADG #1
>
> --- In letterbox-usa@yahoogroups.com, "Judy B" wrote:
> > Very recently, here or on the LBMA site, it was mentioned that
> when
> > REPLYING to a post, if you are changing the discussion topic
then
> the
> > Subject should also be changed to accurately reflect the
> discussion.
> >
> > I couldn't agree more. Could you? Would you?
> > And although I picked the last post I saw to reply to -- it is
an
> > oversight made by many - so not directed to any one poster.
> >
> > Now time for everyone to stand up, stretch, and look out the
> window
> > before we all become computer gnomes.
> >
> > Judy B
> > Fairfax VA
> > sewsowbizzy . . . butting in